Abstract

Organisational commitment and knowledge sharing enjoy unflagging interest in the modern world. Due to the benefits of a high level of organisational commitment and knowledge sharing, this issue is important for scientific and educational development.

The aim of the publication is to determinate the relationship between organisational commitment and knowledge sharing in the teachers' community, in the context of the educational stage at which they work. The basis for the functioning of education involves the commitment of teachers who, by creating, distributing and using their knowledge and ideas, are the foundation of their schools.

The publication was based on the results of previous research, conducted in the form of literature studies and empirical research using quantitative methods in a group of 494 teachers working at various stages of education. The results of the empirical research showed the impact of the educational stage on the relationship between organisational commitment and knowledge sharing among the respondents surveyed. Statistically significant positive correlations between normative commitment and all indicators of knowledge sharing were found in the group of teachers working in secondary and post-secondary schools.

A relationship was identified between organisational commitment in the following three components: affective, continuance and normative commitment, and teachers' knowledge sharing based on a moderator in the form of an educational stage.

Keywords: organisational commitment, affective commitment, continuance commitment, normative commitment, knowledge sharing, educational stage, teacher

References

• Adamska-Chudzińska, M. (2015). Zaangażowanie organizacyjne pracowników jako źródło uczestnictwa w organizacji. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 8(944), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2015.0944.0804
• Almahri, K. S. i Wahab, S. A. (2023). Mediating of organizational commitment to transformational leadership on job performance. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 6(10), 1-7. http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2023.61001
• Amin, M. S. (2022). Organizational commitment, competence on job satisfaction and lecturer performance: Social learning theory approach. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 2(1), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v2i1.156
• Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1086/222820
• Cavaliere, V., Lombardi, S. i Giustiniano, L. (2015). Knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive manufacturing firms. An empirical study of its enablers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6), 1124-1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0538
• Chang, K., Kuo, C. C., Su, M. i Taylor, J. (2013).Dis-identification in organisation (DiO) and its role in the workplace. Industrial Relations, 68(3),479-506. https://doi.org/10.7202/1018437ar
• Chouikha, M. B. i Dakhli, S. (2012). The dimensions of knowledge sharing. MCIS 2012 Proceedings, 16. http://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2012/16
• Cohen, A. (2007). Commitment before and after: An evaluation and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review,17(3), 336-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.05.001
• Demirel, Y.i Göç, K. (2013). The impact of organizational commitment on knowledge sharing. 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, AIIC (s. 954-963).
• Deng, H., Duan, S. X. i Wibowo, S. (2023). Digital technology driven knowledge sharing for job performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 404-425. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2021-0637
• Dharmanegara, I. B. A., Sitiari, N. W. i Adelina, M. E. (2016). The impact of organizational commitment, motivation and job satisfaction on civil servant job performance in state plantation Denpasar. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 18(2), 41-50. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol18-issue2/Version-2/E018224150.pdf
• Garcia, P. S., de, Oliveira, M. i Brohman, K. (2022). Knowledge sharing, hiding and hoarding: how are they related? Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1774434
• Ghosh, S. i Swamy, D. R. (2014). A literature review on organizational commitment - A comprehensive summary. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(12-1), 4-14.
• Hayes, A.F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach (wyd. 3). Guilford Press.
• Hooff, B., van den i Ridder, J.A., de (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675
• Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1534484303257985
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
• Kraaijenbrinka, J., Wijnhovena, A. F. i Groen, A. J. (2005). Do knowledge sources matter? Exploring the effect of knowledge sources on knowledge integration processes. W: Proceedings (CD-ROM) of The Sixth European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities (OKLC).
• Krok, E. (2014). Dzielenie się wiedzą wśród studentów. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, 38(1), 159-168.
• Leja, K. i Stasiak, S. (2010). Wyniki w nauce a postrzeganie i praktykowanie dzielenia się wiedzą wśród uczniów i studentów. e-mentor, 3(35), 4-11. https://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/35/id/748
• Lenart-Gansiniec, R. i Michalik, I. (2018). Zaangażowanie organizacyjne a dzielenie się wiedzą - systematyczny przegląd literatury. W: R. Dorczak (red.), Wybrane zagadnienia zarządzania i przywództwa edukacyjnego (s. 79-93). Instytut Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Li, G., Liu, X., Shang, Y.F. i Xi, Y. (2014). Leader feedback and knowledge sharing: A regulatory focus theory perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(6), 749-763. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.53
• Limon, I. (2022). Relationship between empowering leadership and teachers job performance: Organizational commitment as mediator. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(1), 16-41. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.945201
• Love, K. G. i Stemer, A. P. (2022). Commitment to the university as defined by the Allen and Meyer Model: Student-athlete versus nonstudent-athlete differences. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(4), 799-814. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119879885
• Łochnicka, D. (2015). Zaangażowanie pracownicze jako determinanta rozwoju organizacji. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, XCIV(94), 317-334.
• Meyer, J. P. i Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
• Michalik, I. (2019). Postrzeganie istoty dzielenia się wiedzą wśród nauczycieli XXI wieku. ZN WSH Zarządzanie, 20(1), 213-227.https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2432
• Miszczak, A. i Walasek, J. (2013). Techniki wyboru próby badawczej. Obronność - Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania i Dowodzenia Akademii Obrony Narodowej, 2(6), 100-108.
• Moczydłowska, J. (2013). Zaangażowanie pracowników - aspekty psychologiczne i organizacyjne. Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna, 4(43), 162-171.
• Mohajan, H. K., Islam, S. i Shome, F. (2017). Knowledge sharing enhances knowledge management environment and efficiency. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 5(2),78-82.
• Morawski, M. (2017). Pracownik kluczowy w procesie dzielenia się wiedzą. Motywy, warunki, metody. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
• Nguyen, N. P., Ngo, L. V., Bucic, T. i Nguyen, D. P. (2018). Cross-functional knowledge sharing, coordination and firm performance: The role of cross-functional competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.014
• Nguyen, T. M. i Prentice, C. (2022). Reverse relationship between reward, knowledge sharing and performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20(4), 516-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1821588
• Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. i Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037335
• Probst, G., Raub, S.iRomhardt, K. (2002). Zarządzanie wiedzą w organizacji. Wolters Kluwer.
• Rodriguez-Rad, C. i Sánchez del Rio-Vázquez, M-E. (2023). The relevance of participation behavior, organizational commitment, and attitudinal loyalty to the management of professional associations. Journal of Business Research, 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113324
• Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
• Silva, P., Moreira, A.C. i Mota, J. (2023). Employees' perception of corporate social responsibility and performance: the mediating roles of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(1), 92-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-10-2021-0213
• Suleman, A.-R., Bingab, B. B. B., Boakye, K. O.i Sam-Mensah, R. (2022). Job rotation practices and employees performance: Do job satisfaction and organizational commitment matter? SEISENSE Business Review, 2(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.33215/sbr.v2i1.730
• Tolentino, R. C. (2013). Organizational commitment and job performance of the academic and administrative personnel. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 15(1), 51-59.
• Ustawa. (2016). Ustawa z dnia 14 grudnia 2016 r. Prawo oświatowe (Dz. U. z 2017 poz. 59). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20170000059
• Wziątek-Staśko, A., Lenart-Gansiniec, R. i Michalik, I. (2022). Organizational commitment and knowledge sharing in contemporary companies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003216605
• Zhang, X. i Liu, S. (2021). Understanding relationship commitment and continuous knowledge sharing in online health communities: a social exchange perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(3), 592-614. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2020-0883
• Zheng, T. (2017). A literature review on knowledge sharing. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.53006